West’s sanctions on Russia: Are they just for show?


Let me know what you think.

STI News


Big, big sigh of relief among Russia’s super-rich, as the West announces “smart sanctions” On Sunday, 96.7% of voters in Crimea’s referendum chose to leave Ukraine and join Russia.
Jim Bob‘s insight:

Alexander Nekrassov  former government Kremlin adviser has wrote this article as a Special to CNN.

See on edition.cnn.com

View original post

Advertisements

About tucsonmike

I am originally from Brooklyn, New York and now live in Tucson, Arizona. I have discovered a passion for writing. I have five books out now, with a sixth on the way. Take a look @ my book list: The Search for Livingstone An Affair of the Heart The Search for Otzi Griffith Justice in Space. Moriarty The Life and Times of a Criminal Genius Available now on Smashwords - Amazon and Barnes and Noble As to not bore my public with just "Buy my book," I am also interested in baseball, the outdoors, art, architecture, technology, the human mind and DNA. I learned Ashkenazi Jews, of which I am one, have to lowest rate of Alzheimer's in the world. Therefore, I treat my brain as a muscle needing a workout. I enjoy good food, flirtation, beautiful women (I am happily married for thirty years), so just flirting ;) I was considered autistic when I was young, trying to figure out if I have a mild form of Aspergers and learning from that. That is for future posts. You can also see I love history. Enjoy my sarcastic silly look at the world, and making History more interesting than a textbook.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to West’s sanctions on Russia: Are they just for show?

  1. I will ramble on here, so apologise in advance! Yes, sanctions are all talk. Russia have already welcomed Crimea into their fold, and the Western powers that be, haven’t even met to discuss any possible next steps! Maybe Russia should be left to get on with it, as more of the Crimea population is Russian than Ukrainian. I wonder why other countries have to intervene and decide a referendum in Crimea is illegal. In the UK, they never have any referendums concerning the most important issues. The electorate votes every four years, wow wee, how is that democracy in a political party two horse race! It is very crazy! No country can really take the moral ground! I suppose in the West, Governments are used to other countries Governments sticking their noses in their business, but Russia aren’t, so why threaten, and then maybe go to war, when the world has enough issues as it is! As Tony Benn once said, ‘if a country can find money to go to war, why can’t they find money to help people with’; priorities please! Governments need to rethink, and look at their own countries and issues first and foremost. Leave other countries alone.

    • tucsonmike says:

      I can’t disagree. In the case of the U.S. we have no strategic interest in Ukraine. Most Russians don’t see Ukrainians as a separate people. Their attitude is “Give it up, you’re Russians!” Also, Kiev is where the Russian state began, so they resent the fact it’s in a separate country. Kraina in Slavic languages means borderland. There was no such thing as Ukrainian nationalism until two centuries ago. Traditionally, it was the borderland between Russia and the Ottomans.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s